|
THE ECONOMY
|
As Public Comment Period Ends, Statewide Gas Ban Movement Asks, "Is NYC’s Approach Industry-Friendly |
|
|
|
|
Written by mike bernhard
|
|
Friday, 01 January 2010 |
(December 29th, New York) As the comment period for the State Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) is set to expire December 31st, many environmental scientists and activists are raising pointed objections to recent decisions made by New York City-based politicians and corporate environmental organizations. In its report released last week on the SGEIS, regarding the use of hydraulic fracturing in the extraction of natural gas from shale rock, the Bloomberg Administration concluded that this technique of gas drilling should be banned around the reservoirs which provide water to New York City, due to its potentially harmful effects on the city's water supply. As a result, Mayor Bloomberg announced his official position in support of a ban on drilling, but only in the New York City Watershed. "Studies of the effects of gas drilling in Western states have proven that partial or two-tiered regulatory structures do not work. A ban on drilling only in the NYC watershed would be wholly inadequate in protecting the state’s water, air and farmland," declared Gusti Bogok of the Safe Water Movement, an environmental organization based in New York City. Mike Bernhard, spokesperson for the Chenango Delaware Otsego Gas Drilling Opposition Group (CDOG) said "A ban that applies only to the City’s water supply not only abandons its fellow New Yorkers upstate, but also leaves New York City residents vulnerable to the serious health hazards and environmental degradation posed by this destructive drilling process." "A ban in what is mistakenly referred to as 'the NYC watershed' would create an 'us vs. them' scenario, playing directly into the hands of the fossil-fuel industry and its political cohorts," stated Robert Jereski, a Democratic Party County Committeeman from New York City and signatory to the statewide ban petition. "If it's unsafe near our water supplies, why doesn't the Mayor oppose this unsafe drilling technique near all water supplies, including those of upstate residents or in the city's foodsheds there?" he asked. The petition has garnered thousands of signatures in New York City and across the state. “We applaud the DEP’s efforts to reveal the dangers of frack drilling, but disagree with their limited conclusion," added Harry J. Bubbins, Director of the Friends of Brook Park. The South Bronx based organization has spearheaded the creation of a local Community Supported Agriculture program and Farmer’s Market which are reliant on fresh organic vegetables from upstate regions. "The only way to safeguard our food and water supply here in New York is to advance a state-wide ban. If they drill one foot outside of the Catskill watershed everything is still in danger of ruin,” Bubbins pointed out. "Doesn't the City's approach to drilling seem too deferential to this industry? Isn't its response to the real environmental dangers posed unscientific?" he asked rhetorically. The scientific evidence gathered from states where gas drilling has already taken place, has revealed migration of dangerous chemical fluids and contamination of aquifers, rivers and agricultural lands miles away from drilling sites, while toxic fracking gases flow downwind and contribute to ozone and greenhouse gas pollution. SWiM and a growing movement of environmental activists statewide recognize that the only way to protect all New Yorkers is to implement a comprehensive and state-wide ban of hydraulic fracturing.
|
|
|
TOWN OF TOMPKINS (Delaware Co): WITHDRAW the SGEIS |
|
|
|
|
Written by mike bernhard
|
|
Tuesday, 29 December 2009 |
The following letter was sent to DEC from the Town Board of the Town of Tompkins, Delaware County, NY.
TOWN OF TOMPKINS HOME OF THE CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR DELAWARE COUNTY PO BOX 139 TROUT CREEK, NY 13847 December 17, 2009 Mr. Jack Dahl Bureau of Oil & Gas Regulation Attn: dSGEIS Comments NYSDEC Division of Mineral Resources 625 Broadway, Third Floor Albany, NY 12233-6500 Dear Mr. Dahl, On December 14, 2009, the board of the Town of Tompkins in Delaware County, NY, unanimously endorsed the letter from Town of Tompkins resident Stephen Dungan (originally written and sent to Governor Paterson), and joins with him in calling for “a one year minimum continuation of the statewide moratorium on gas drilling and high volume hydrofracturing, until such time as the document can be rewritten to provide adequate protections to the environment and the citizens of the State.” What follows is Mr. Dungan’s letter.
December 2, 2009
Dear Governor Paterson,
I implore you to withdraw the DEC Draft SGEIS on Horizontal Gas Drilling, High Volume Hyrofracturing and Production and declare a one year minimum continuation of the statewide moratorium on gas drilling and high volume hydrofracturing, until such time as the document can be rewritten to provide adequate protections to the environment and the citizens of the State. As presented, the DSGEIS fails to adequately address numerous aspects that would provide those protections.
Before any drilling and production may commence, you must direct the Commissioner of DEC to completely rewrite the DSGEIS and require that it includes and details:
Fully adequate environmental and community safeguards taking into account cumulative impacts of this type of drilling, hyrofracturing and gas production. There must be a clear plan for fully assessing and mitigating the cumulative impacts of gas drilling and extraction on water, air, land use and values, forests, plants, animals, people and community character
A clear plan for DEC inclusion and collaboration of local government and communities in reviewing all aspects of gas drilling and production including location and density of all drilling pads and bores, central storage and support facilities, compressor stations, pipelines, etc.
A ban gas well drilling in the floodplain
The final SGEIS must require that gas companies adhere to all requirements of Federal Clean Water and Air Legislation
A complete ban on the use of any known toxic chemicals in fracking fluids
A clear plan with specified limitations and community safeguards for any and all water withdrawals that protects and prevents depletion of local water sources, public and private
A clear plan, requirements and gas company liability for handling, storing, tracking, transporting and processing all waste including any drilling and fracking fluid materials, and all toxic chemicals, gases, minerals and radiation produced or released in the process, with clear protocols for each
A clear plan and requirements for fully protecting all aquifers, public and private drinking water sources and required pre drilling and ongoing test well monitoring at each well site and along all horizontal bores as well as pre and ongoing testing of any public or private water sources within one mile of well sites and bores.
Clearly specified gas company financial responsibility for all water source monitoring with DEC responsibility to conduct all monitoring or oversee independent contracting of it
A clear plan and requirements for preventing any and all releases of toxic gases into the air including gas company responsibility for collecting and appropriately processing any and all gases produced during all phases drilling, hydrofracturing and ongoing production as well as clearly specified gas company financial responsibility for all air quality monitoring with DEC responsibility to conduct all monitoring or oversee independent contracting of it
A clear plan for assessing and mitigating community impacts of all aspects of gas drilling and production
There must be a specific assessment of the impacts of related heavy truck and machinery traffic on local roads and bridges with pre drilling and ongoing assessments as well as clearly specified gas company liability for the costs of any and all needed repairs There must be a specific assessment of the impacts and mitigation of all emissions of trucks and related drilling and production machinery
All accidents related to gas drilling and production need to be regulated with clearly specified liability and mitigation requirements.
The DEC must promulgate accompanying regulations with appropriate rule making procedures covering all of the above, not simply suggest conditions. Any and all costs of implementing and monitoring DEC Regulations and requirements must be borne by the gas companies. There must be a clear DEC plan for adequate staffing and support for regulatory oversight and monitoring with gas company financial responsibility and bonding to ensure adequate oversight and monitoring over the lifetime of drilling, production, closure and ongoing monitoring.
No costs or unwanted responsibilities shall be passed to local government and communities.
Only when these provisions are included, can the DSGEIS on Horizontal Gas Drilling, High Volume Hyrofracturing and Production be considered as providing adequate environmental and community protections.
Respectfully,
Stephen Dungan Respectfully submitted, William Layton, Supervisor Howard Buttel, Board Member Timothy LaTourette, Board Member Peggy Backus, Board Member Carl Stuendel, Board Member
|
|
|
Green Party of New York Decries Senate Health Care Sellout |
|
|
|
|
Written by mike bernhard
|
|
Thursday, 24 December 2009 |
.
The Green Party of New York State decries the “historic” deal reached in the Senate as historic only in the sense of its betrayal of American working people, women, and democracy. Green Party members across the United States still demand single-payer, universal health care, the most efficient and proven plan to cover all citizens. The plan on the table in the Senate has had even the most basic “public option” removed for the benefit of the insurance companies and the “Blue Dog” Democrats, with the complicity of so-called progressive Senators like Russ Feingold and Bernie Sanders. Sen. Benjamin Nelson managed to extort a compromise that sacrificed women’s rights as well and privileges for Nebraska in terms of Medicaid payments that no other state will receive.
“The Senate bill represents the worst of all possible worlds: a mandate for everyone to purchase private insurance, national non-profit private plans that will absorb the most costly patients unwanted by private insurance, massive subsidies to the insurance industry, and a complete evisceration of a woman’s right to an abortion under her health-care plan. To call this a victory even by the standards of what the weakest of so-called progressives wanted during the summer is a farce; it is complete capitulation to the conservatives in the Senate and the insurance industry’s campaign donations and lobbying,” said Matt Funiciello, owner of Rock Hill Bakehouse and Green Party activist.
“America has become a failed state, with a few Senators from states with virtually none of the population twisting and destroying the chance for real health care reform for the rest of the nation. Senator Nelson received a promise from Harry Reid that the federal government would pay for all Medicaid expansion in Nebraska in perpetuity, something no other state is promised. Senators Lieberman, Baucus, and the other Senate “moderates” were able to craft a bill with the blessing of the insurance industry and no opposition from the White House, and so-called progressives like Feingold and Sanders let it happen. The Green Party has been arguing for years that we need one person, one vote, which would mean abolition of the Senate and unicameral Congress, and expansion of grassroots democratic control. If this doesn’t show the need for campaign finance reform, nothing will,” said Peter LaVenia, co-chair of the New York State Green Party.”
“What’s America’s breaking point? The Congressional Democratic proposals were bad for health care reform from the start because they sought to expand the role of private insurance companies when our present system of insurance is the reason why we pay so much money for the worst health care system among the world's industrial countries. The Senate bill became so bad that even mainstream Democratic groups and individuals such as Moveon.org, Howard Dean and the AFL-CIO could no longer go along with the fraud. Rather than mandating that everyone buy health insurance, we need to eliminate health insurance companies from our health care system. We need a program that saves money while guaranteeing quality health care to every American,” stated David Doonan, mayor of Greenwich, NY.
Contacts: Peter LaVenia: 518-495-8001,
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Eric Jones: 716-908-5226,
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
|
U.S. wants farmers to use coal waste on fields |
|
|
|
|
Written by http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/22/AR2009122203336.html?wprss=rss_busin
|
|
Thursday, 24 December 2009 |
By Associated Press Wednesday, December 23, 2009 The federal government is encouraging farmers to spread a chalky waste from coal-fired power plants on their fields to loosen and fertilize soil even as it considers regulating coal wastes for the first time. The material is produced by power plant "scrubbers" that remove acid-rain-causing sulfur dioxide from plant emissions. A synthetic form of the mineral gypsum, it also contains mercury, arsenic, lead and other heavy metals. The Environmental Protection Agency says those toxic metals occur in only tiny amounts that pose no threat to crops, surface water or people. But some environmentalists say too little is known about how the material affects crops, and ultimately human health, for the government to suggest that farmers use it. "This is a leap into the unknown," said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. "This stuff has materials in it that we're trying to prevent entering the environment from coal-fired power plants, and then to turn around and smear it across ag lands raises some real questions." With wastes piling up around the coal-fired plants that produce half the nation's power, the EPA and U.S. Department of Agriculture began promoting what they call the wastes' "beneficial uses" during the Bush administration. Part of that push is to expand the use of synthetic gypsum -- a whitish, calcium-rich material known as flue gas desulfurization gypsum, or FGD gypsum. The Obama administration has continued promoting FGD gypsum's use in farming. if ( show_doubleclick_ad && ( adTemplate & INLINE_ARTICLE_AD ) == INLINE_ARTICLE_AD && inlineAdGraf ) { placeAd('ARTICLE',commercialNode,20,'inline=y;',true) ; } The administration is also drafting a regulatory rule for coal waste, in response to a spill from a coal ash pond near Knoxville, Tenn., one year ago Tuesday. Ash and water flooded 300 acres, damaging homes and killing fish. The cleanup is expected to cost about $1 billion. The EPA is expected to announce its proposals for regulation early next year, setting the first federal standards for storage and disposal of coal wastes. EPA officials declined to talk about the agency's promotion of FGD gypsum before then and would not say whether the draft rule would cover it. Field studies have shown that mercury, the main heavy metal of concern because it can harm nervous-system development, does not accumulate in crops or run off fields in surface water at "significant" levels, the EPA said. "EPA believes that the use of FGD gypsum in agriculture is safe in appropriate soil and hydrogeologic conditions," the statement said. Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project, which advocates for more effective enforcement of environmental laws, said he is not overly worried about FGD gypsum's use on fields because research shows it contains only tiny amounts of heavy metals. But he said federal limits on the amounts of heavy metals in FGD gypsum sold to farmers would help allay concerns. "That would give them assurance that they've got clean FGD gypsum," he said. Since the EPA-USDA partnership began in 2001, farmers' use of the material has more than tripled, from about 78,000 tons spread on fields in 2002 to nearly 279,000 tons last year, according to the American Coal Ash Association, a utility industry group. About half of the 17.7 million tons of FGD gypsum produced in the United States last year was used to make drywall, said Thomas Adams, the association's executive director. But he said it is important to find new uses for it and other coal wastes because the United States will probably rely on coal-fired power plants for decades to come. "If we can find safe ways to recycle those materials, we're a lot better off doing that than we are creating a whole bunch of new landfills," Adams said. |
|
|
Community Health Survey Shows Shale Gas Threatens Human Health Groups, Town of DISH urge Texas regul |
|
|
|
|
Written by http://earthworksaction.org/PR_DISH_HealthSurveyRelease.cfm
|
|
Thursday, 17 December 2009 |
For Release: Thursday, December 17, 8:30 am Central
EARTHWORKS * Texas Oil & Gas Accountability Project * Town of DISHDISH, Texas, 12/17 -- Today, public interest groups and the Town of DISH released the final results of a health survey of area residents focused on the impacts of Barnett Shale gas infrastructure. The results show that more than half of surveyed maladies can be attributed to toxics first revealed in September in a DISH-commissioned study of area air quality. Based on the results, EARTHWORKS, the Texas Oil & Gas Accountability Project and the Town of DISH are calling on state regulators to immediately perform an in-depth health investigation, implement continuous 24-hour emissions monitoring, and establish a same-day community odor and symptom tracking system.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 17 December 2009 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 37 - 45 of 297 |
|