|
The APT: American Political Terms |
|
|
|
|
Written by David Cyr
|
|
Thursday, 31 January 2013 |
|
A lexicon dedicated to apt reality based definitions of many American political terms Clean Money-Clean Elections:a particularly devious means for counter-revolutionary retrograde reformers to keep elections focused upon candidates raising money from contributors, rather than having society sensibly provide equal public access for all candidates to freely contribute ideas
a sure way for the corporate-state to cheaply purchase emerging political entities, ensuring that they will obediently collaborate in protecting and preserving the state, and never disobediently produce any real systemic change
a corrupt bureaucratic-minded scheme designed to preserve the problem, by creating a bureaucracy to manage money in elections, instead of removing money from elections
an alternative corrupting policy championed by the "progressive" conservatives who are opposed to getting all money out of elections a "progressive" effort to organize the corruption of money in elections, so money can corrupt candidates more efficiently a policy with Orwellian labeling advocated by those desiring some dirty money spread around in their campaigns public funded elections:the public financing the corporate party's (R) & (D) candidates in every election pre-determined by districting, so private money can focus upon massively funding the corporate party's candidates in any possibly contested elections
a dishonest advocacy intent upon maintaining a problem — money in elections — in opposition to the only honest solution, which would be no money in elections
tthe public giving money to candidates the public doesn't support, who believe that their having more money is the only answer for too much money in elections
a desperate means to keep money deciding, keep money deciding, keep money deciding
policy keeping money contributions more important than ideas contributed
the public providing the money to fund the corruption of candidates reform:paint over rot
a liberal means of preserving rot that should be removed
liberal measures taken to prevent a solution, with intent to protect and preserve the problem |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 17 May 2013 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by David Cyr
|
|
Saturday, 15 September 2012 |
|

Frightened Electorates Always React Stupidly (FEARS) |
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 15 September 2012 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by David Cyr
|
|
Tuesday, 04 September 2012 |
|

In the world that we live in, sanity has always been a minority possession. The sane minority has never determined which face for evil was fashionable. The insane majority has fought between its (R) & (D) factions to decide that. |
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 15 September 2012 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by David Cyr
|
|
Wednesday, 14 March 2012 |
|

The Democrats who make the Green Party'snonviolent revolution impossiblewill make violent revolution inevitable. |
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 16 July 2012 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Voter Consent Wastes Dissent |
|
|
|
|
Written by David Cyr
|
|
Thursday, 20 October 2011 |
|

Does it make any sense for people to keep voting for what they protest against? In these Corporate States of America, elections function as a barometer for the corporate-state to frequently measure the actual level of societal dissidence. No other polls matter. Street demonstrations and civil disobedience haven't had any effect — haven't produced desired change — because near all the demonstrators have later corporate obediently supported the corporate money manufactured Republican and Democrat candidates. Elections have only been serving to provide proofs positive that a supermajority of participants (voters voting) either affirmatively support, or they meekly acquiesce to having "our government" continue to do unto others and to themselves whatever the sociopathic corporate persons decide. |
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 24 October 2011 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 9 of 297 |